Login Register
 °

It's not about killing badgers

By Western Daily Press  |  Posted: November 01, 2012

NFU President Peter Kendall regrets the enforced delay to the pilot badger culls but insists the decision to hold off was the right one

NFU President Peter Kendall regrets the enforced delay to the pilot badger culls but insists the decision to hold off was the right one

Comments (0)

To dismiss any doubt from the outset I want to reiterate, the NFU remains committed to delivering the two pilot badger culls as part of this Government's programme to eradicate the devastating effects of TB in cattle.

The farmer-led companies tasked with carrying out the two pilot culls remain committed to delivering next year. I also know from listening to government ministers last week they remain absolutely committed to their policy which will see us start on the very long path to TB eradication in this country. Deciding to delay was one of the most difficult decisions we at the NFU, working with those farmers in Somerset and Gloucestershire, have had to face – but all things considered it was the right decision to make.

These past few months, and indeed years, of working with members and staff on TB has given me a real insight into what it must mean to a farmer who hears their vet say, "I'm sorry, this one's a reactor". Farmers tell me of their shock, disbelief and horror the first time they hear the news; those in the hotspot areas tell me of their frustration and desperation for a solution; not tomorrow, not next year, but now. I know how devastated farmers are to hear once again there is delay. That is why last week's decision to postpone was such a hard decision to make.

There have been a series of stumbling blocks, all of which have pushed back the start date. To start, we faced a delay when policing issues during the Olympics and Paralympics were raised. There have been two legal challenges that had to be fought and won at the High Court and then at the Court of Appeal. And you don't need me to tell you we have had appalling weather, resulting in flooded land. And it's already the end of October. The clocks have gone back, winter and the short days are here. And there wasn't just this year to consider. Let's not forget, these two pilots are the first areas to go, where we have to demonstrate farmers can carry out a cull of badgers safely, effectively and humanely. No ifs or buts. We had to be sure we could get it right.

It is no big secret that we have been frustrated by the delays but the main hurdle has been the sheer numbers of badgers that had to be culled, given that the science tells us that we have to take out 70 per cent in each area to achieve meaningful disease reduction in cattle. Because Defra wanted to be absolutely sure that the policy could withstand any legal challenge on the numbers of badgers involved, they carried out this most recent sett survey. The numbers that came back surprised us all. Everyone knew the badger population had grown massively in the interim years since the last survey in the 90s but no-one expected the sheer volumes revealed by the survey and that this meant that the targets had increased substantially; in Gloucester from 1,729 to 3,074 and in Somerset from 1,824 to 3,560.

I have heard reports that this year's delay is now down to costs. That is simply not the case. The increase in badger numbers is huge but only added marginal costs to the overall cull. No, the delay has been based on the fact that we could no longer be absolutely sure we could achieve the desired targets of the numbers of badgers to be culled and, as importantly, in doing so meet the approval from the independent panel that will assess the two pilots, before other areas can be rolled out in subsequent years.

If there is one criticism I will take on the chin it was that we didn't delay earlier. We went to the wire because we knew how much this means to everyone involved. We threw the kitchen sink at trying to get the right resources in place so that these pilots could be delivered successfully. We focused our efforts on confirming additional resources; training and assessing those that came forward in days rather than weeks in order to have gun licences amended in time. In the end it became clear to all it simply couldn't go ahead successfully this year in the time left. For everyone looking at these pilots and hoping their area is next; for those battling with TB on their farms, and for those farming in clear areas who want to stay that way, the risk of failure was too high. We owed it to them all to make the right decision.

The Government and the Secretary of State have been very clear; there has been no change in policy. Despite arguments to the contrary, the science remains clear. Culling badgers will lead to a reduction of the disease in cattle if it is carried out over a large enough area and for a sufficient length of time. With TB cases currently doubling in number every nine years, with 34,000 cattle being slaughtered because of TB in Great Britain last year, we remain steadfast in our goal. This has never been about killing badgers. This has been about stamping out a disease. For those that have suggested that this cull is irresponsible, I think the decision we have made shows this is simply not the case. We want to see healthy cattle, healthy badgers and a healthy countryside. That is why the decision to delay was the right one.

Read more from Western Daily Press

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters
  • fischadler  |  November 01 2012, 12:21PM

    How can these people say it is not about killing badgers when it blatantly is. They are so blinkered in their views . They just will not admit they are wrong even though the vast majority of the UK are against killing badgers, scientists and vets are against killing badgers and parliament voted against killing badgers. When are they going to listen to common sense or do they really want a confrontation in the countryside?

    |   10
  • Barri  |  November 01 2012, 12:16PM

    There are NO Badgers on the Isle of Man, yet bTB is still prevalent there. Why blame and kill Badgers ? End of !

    |   10
  • Clued-Up  |  November 01 2012, 10:36AM

    The tighter cattle management controls operating over THE LAST 12 MONTHS reduced the incidence of cattle bTB by 30% (ie by double the amount a badger cull might have achieved in 4 YEARS). The new cattle management controls coming in Jan 2013 can be expected to build on that success in reducing cattle bTB. By June 2013 (the month when Peter Kendall, Owen Paterson and co) hope to restart the badger cull project, there will be 18 months evidence showing that the best, most effective way of reducing cattle bTB right now is through properly enforced regulations on cattle management and movement. Hopefully, the new cattle vaccine will already be being clinically tested under UK conditions. If Owen Paterson is daft enough to try pressing on with a badger cull next year he'll find himself back on the back benches. Up to 97% public are opposed to a badger cull and accept the evidence offered by scientists that killing badgers won't reduce cattle bTB. The government's already looking weak and shaky - it doesn't need the further dent to its popularity that would be caused by going ahead with this pointless killing spree.

    |   15
  • Simon_Gardner  |  November 01 2012, 10:33AM

    It's about killing badgers. That's why the public is so overwhelmingly opposed.

    |   14

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES