Login Register

Billions should be invested in new nuclear power stations

By Western Daily Press  |  Posted: June 22, 2012

Comments (0)

Billions of pounds should be invested in new nuclear power stations to keep the lights on, the Government’s former chief scientist said yesterday.

Such a move would be a massive U-turn for the Government – its policy is to back new nuclear but not subsidise it – and trigger a major split with the Liberal Democrats.

But Professor Sir David King said without heavyweight Government intervention, a new generation of nuclear reactors will simply not be built.

His demand could also see the £32 billion Severn Barrage get the go-ahead after decades of wrangling. But it is the call to intervene on nuclear, rather than let the free market take responsibility, that is most controversial and will anger green pressure groups.

The radical move could revive the proposed new nuclear reactor at Oldbury in Gloucestershire, after its backers dropped out over the risk to their investment. And it would ensure that Somerset’s Hinkley Point C – where EDF is yet to make a final decision – goes ahead.

“I think the Treasury feels this is up to the market to deliver, but actually this is isn’t going to happen,” Sir David said. “Infrastructure on this scale is going to need public-private partnership with strong Treasury intervention to signal where the investment should take place.”

He warned: “There are situations where dogma takes over from reason – that’s what may well be happening here.”

Sir David was the Government’s top scientist from 2000 to 2007, and was in charge during the foot-and-mouth crisis of 2001, while publicising the threat from climate change.

Prime Minister David Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne must get involved, rather than leading it to Lib Dem Environment Secretary Ed Davey, he argued.

“There’s a massive investment opportunity, which needs to be opened up by Government putting money in – which demonstrates confidence.”

The need to move road transport from petrol to electricity would require a new generation of nuclear reactors to cope with demand.

And infrastructure projects such as the Severn Barrage, previously ruled out as too expensive, could be back on the cards with private-sector interest, boosting the economy and providing jobs, he said.

The Western Daily Press reported in March how German companies RWE and E.ON scrapped their massive investment plans for Oldbury, in Gloucestershire, and Wylfa in North Wales, under the Horizon project.

Meanwhile, EDF this week announced a £2 billion contract for development work at Hinkley, but the firms will take a final investment decision at the end of the year.

And Mr Davey stressed the coalition policy is no public subsidy for new nuclear.

A Department of Energy and Climate Change spokesman told the Daily Press last night: “We are clear that it will be for energy companies to construct, operate and decommission nuclear power stations.”

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters
  • siarad2  |  June 23 2012, 4:22PM

    Only if the warmongers insist on uranium fuel to make bombs instead of thorium fuel, whose tiny amount of waste has a half-life of tens of years not tens of thousands of years & is incapable of meltdown.

    Rate   1
    Report
  • PCAH3  |  June 23 2012, 10:57AM

    A Department of Energy and Climate Change spokesman told the Daily Press last night: "We are clear that it will be for energy companies to construct, operate and decommission nuclear power stations." And who's going to pay for the spent fuel and nuclear waste disposal? The same taxpayers who would have already guaranteed a nuclear electricity price and taken insurance responsibility for nuclear accidents. EDF will only 'invest' in Hinkley Point new nuclear build if they first receive huge subsidies from the Treasury who would also be spending taxpayers' money.

    Rate   -2
    Report
  • Charlespk  |  June 22 2012, 7:54PM

    'Common Purpose' have made a total pig's ear of their European Dream, but they are still trying to destroy the United Kingdom. http://tinyurl.com/72gthgl (open in a new window)

    Rate 0
    Report
  • roypum  |  June 22 2012, 6:30PM

    Why should the Government take any notice of what Sir David King thinks? He is a notorious proponent of new nuclear. And yet, when he was chief scientist to Blair and Brown, both of whom weren't anti-nuclear, he still couldn't persuade either of them to fund the building of any new nuclear power stations.

    Rate   -2
    Report

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES

       
       
       

      MOST POPULAR