Login Register

Big rise in number of people getting benefits docked in Bath

By Chron_News  |  Posted: April 30, 2013

Comments (5)

More than 100 sanctions leading to dole claimants having their benefits docked were handed out in Bath in the first five months of last year alone.

The action to stop or reduce a person’s Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) is taken against those deemed by jobcentres not to be meeting the conditions for receiving the payout, such as attending adviser interviews or being available for work.

The system has been at the centre of recent controversy amid claims that jobcentre staff have been set targets to withdraw benefits in a move to bring down unemployment figures.

This is rejected by the Government which argues sanctions are only used as a last resort when claimants “refuse to play by the rules”.

Latest figures published in Parliament show 110 benefit sanctions were issued in Bath up to the end of last May, 240 in Chippenham, 100 in North East Somerset, 140 in North Wiltshire, and 300 in South West Wiltshire.

Latest full year figures for 2011 also showed the overall number of sanctions had increased markedly since 2009.

In Bath, there were 410 compared to 210 two years earlier, Chippenham 340 (140), North East Somerset 270 (130), North Wiltshire 260 (120) and South West Wiltshire 350 (150).

Last October, the Government introduced a tougher penalty regime.

Until then claimants could have their JSA sanctioned for up to 26 weeks, but under the new system their payment could be stopped for up to three years, depending on the breach of conditions and how many times it had happened before.

A DWP spokesman said: “When people claim Jobseeker’s Allowance, they agree to a contract - we offer them the support they need to find work but they agree to do everything possible to prepare for and find work.

“Sanctions are used as a last resort when claimants refuse to play by the rules. People cannot expect to keep their benefits if they do not hold up their end of the bargain.”

In March, Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith was forced to deny opposition claims that jobcentre staff had been set targets to sanction benefits.

Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Liam Byrne pointed to a leaked email which suggested staff were being pressured by managers to increase the number of claimants referred to a “stricter benefit regime”, or face disciplinary action.

Mr Duncan Smith insisted “there are no targets for any sanctions whatsoever” and said anyone using them would be disciplined.

Read more from Western Daily Press

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters


  • MoeXXX  |  May 01 2013, 10:18PM

    Daily Mash reporting it now, so must be true http://tinyurl.com/bqhbvuy

    |   1
  • bagonails  |  May 01 2013, 8:46AM

    Moe, allow me to translate: "Guardian link? Obvious crimethink! Doubleplusungood newspaper! Crimestop!"

    |   6
  • MoeXXX  |  April 30 2013, 11:40PM

    Are you suggesting its untrue then? Hmmm. This is a dilemma. Should I trust the Guardian, which relies almost entirely on its reputation for accurate reporting and helpfully provides links to sources where I can verify the evidence for myself? Or should I trust Malcolm, who didn't offer any evidence at all - but did make a totally irrelevant sweeping attack on the Guardian's tax arrangements? Tough call.

    |   7
  • mcupis  |  April 30 2013, 11:06PM

    We haven't learnt that. We've been told that by a newspaper that is run by tax dodgers in the Cayman Islands, which has a circulation of roughly zero everywhere other than Salford and Islington and is only kept afloat by money siphoned off from a magazine that sells evil, polar bear murdering motor cars. Pay no attention.

    |   -8
  • MoeXXX  |  April 30 2013, 10:45PM

    And today we learn that failure to complete a fake psychometric test is providing the government with yet another 'excuse' to remove benefits. http://tinyurl.com/d7ywqks

    |   8